Skip to content
Sample estate — demo data, no sign-up. Demo tools (this bar, “Explore as”, the side menu) are not part of the product. Pre-quote request
MyFamilyInherits — home Start free
MFI — Item detail with HeirChat in progress
MyFamilyInherits
🏴 England & Wales
Estate item · fine art

Dovestone Reservoir (watercolour)

Watercolour · by a local artist · framed · “always hung in Dad's study”

Dovestone
Valuation verified 4 photos Family interest: 2
£3,500 High confidence

Valued from comparable sales of work by the same local artist.

Valued on
12 September 2026
Valuer
Local fine-art valuer, Cheshire
Comparables
£3,100 · £3,800 (2025–26)
Insurance
On the household policy schedule
  • 1968
    Bought from the artist at a Peak District art trail
  • 1991
    Re-framed; receipt kept
  • 2009
    Hung in David's study at 23 Maple Drive ever since
  • 2026
    Catalogued & valued for the estate on MyFamilyInherits
Not yet decided
David is weighing two family wishes
No beneficiary recorded for this item — the decision below will set it.

HeirChat · the Dovestone watercolour

A gentle conversation about who'd like this · you choose what's shared
DR SR DN MLP
Two people have said they'd love this. That's completely normal — many families do. MFI keeps both wishes side by side so you can decide calmly, in your own time. Nothing is shared beyond this thread.
Tuesday
Sarah · daughter
I'd love this one if it's ever an option — it always hung in Dad's study and I can still picture him there. No pressure at all, just putting my hand up. 💛
Tue · 10:12
Sarah registered an interest in this painting
Daniel · son
Oh — I'd actually really like it too, if that's alright. I'd hang it in Perth and think of the walks we did there. Happy to talk it through, whatever you both think is fairest.
Tue · 18:40
Daniel registered an interest in this painting
From your estate & the INHERIT standard
Two beneficiaries have expressed an interest in the same item. You can give it to one person, ask them to share it, or note that it should be sold and the proceeds divided. Specific gifts of a single item can't be split — so a clear note here helps your executor later. This surfaces your data and the rule; it doesn't decide for you.
Today
David · you
I love that you both feel that way about it — it means a great deal. Let me think it over this week. Whatever I decide, I'll explain why, so there are no surprises.
Today · 09:05
Your question: "Would you like the watercolour on your wall, Adam?"
Waiting for Adam · 4 days

Because Adam is under 16, the polite WhatsApp goes to his parent, Sarah. It never names anything in your estate. See the message · Reminder settings

David's decision · draft
“The watercolour goes to Sarah, who lives closer. Daniel receives a good print of it — and I've written both of them a note explaining why.” Recorded but not yet final — you can change this any time before it's confirmed.
Visible to: David & the solicitor only · not shared with Sarah or Daniel yet

You control who's in this thread and what each person sees. We'll never share your decision until you choose to.

Built on INHERIT v2

This demo is built on INHERIT v2 — an open standard for describing an estate. We show you honestly which parts of this screen the standard can hold today, which are planned, and which are still gaps.

  • Supported now0 entriesThe standard already has a place for this today.
  • Supported now · shared core2 entriesSupported by the part of the standard shared across our brands.
  • Planned2 entriesA change proposal covers this. Where we can check the standard’s own record, we show its status.
  • Gap — needs planning0 entriesOn the screen, but no change proposal covers it yet. These still need planning.
  • Not a standard concept0 entriesPage furniture, or something we decided the standard should not hold.

4 traced entries on this screen, from two overlapping traces

Each entry comes from either the screen’s feature list or the data the screen displays. The two traces overlap, so one feature can appear twice: these are entries, not a count of distinct features.

  • PlannedNamed item "Dovestone Reservoir (watercolour)" £3,500

    ICP-0001 Port v1 consumer-estate surface into v2 (retracted in the standard)ICP-0030 Catalogue item-import adapter (approved in the standard)ICP-0062 Collections & asset disposition

    traced from the data this screen displays

  • PlannedValuation / provenance facets

    ICP-0007 Valuation lifecycle enrichmentICP-0046 Multi-opinion / consensus valuation shape (approved in the standard)ICP-0014 Collector records bundleICP-0013 Condition gradingICP-0054 Asset-side external-registry enrichmentICP-0055 Asset enrichment facets: maker/external-id

    traced from the data this screen displays

  • Supported now · shared corecatalogue.item-detail

    Shared core: shared-core#catalogue.item-detail

    traced from the screen’s feature list

  • Supported now · shared corecompanion.facilitator-thread

    Shared core: shared-core#companion.facilitator-thread

    traced from the screen’s feature list

The 29 change proposals this demo relies on

A change proposal (ICP) is a tracked request to extend the standard. These are the ones behind the “Planned” features across all 33 screens — and the few already adopted and built. Where the standard has a written proposal we show its status from the standard’s own record; where it does not, we say so rather than guess.

  • ICP-0001 · TT-657 — Port v1 consumer-estate surface into v2 (retracted in the standard)
  • ICP-0002 · TT-658 — IHT 36% reduced charity rate (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0006 · TT-663 — Marketplace & dealer model (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0007 · TT-664 — Valuation lifecycle enrichment (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0008 · TT-665 — Delegation, stewardship & marketplace integrity (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0013 · TT-672 — Condition grading (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0014 · TT-673 — Collector records bundle (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0015 · TT-674 — Legal-assurance model (pending in the standard)
  • ICP-0016 · TT-681 — Professional engagement & marketplace data model (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0019 · TT-684 — Executor / personal-representative appointment & powers model (pending in the standard)
  • ICP-0021 · TT-686 — Wishes, directives & plan-assessment primitives (pending in the standard)
  • ICP-0022 · TT-1029 — Post-death estate-administration & will-lifecycle domain (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0024 · TT-1031 — Nomination / expression-of-wish — non-testamentary transfer route (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0026 · TT-1033 — Free-text→structured multi-entity extraction (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0027 · TT-1034 — Living-Monitoring change-event model (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0028 · TT-1040 — Couple / mirror-vs-mutual wills modelling (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0029 · TT-1954 — Insurance-cover model (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0030 · TT-1069 — Catalogue item-import adapter (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0033 · TT-1131 — Executor pre-death readiness facet (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0034 · TT-1132 — E&W IHT spouse exemption (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0044 · TT-1143 — Steward/authority-grant remuneration facet + paid-helper undue-influence safeguard (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0046 · TT-1144 — Multi-opinion / consensus valuation shape (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0047 · TT-1145 — Compute faith fixed-shares (approved in the standard)
  • ICP-0052 · TT-1292 — Funeral & farewell domain (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0054 · TT-1174 — Asset-side external-registry enrichment (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0055 · TT-1175 — Asset enrichment facets: maker/external-id (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0061 · TT-687 — Heir collaboration & asset-claim resolution (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0062 · TT-688 — Collections & asset disposition (tracked; no written proposal yet)
  • ICP-0070 · TT-969 — Steward / AuthorityBasis — who may act for whom, with what authority, scope and consent, and the legal-effect confirmation rule (tracked; no written proposal yet)

Checked against a pinned copy of the standard’s change-proposal register (73 proposals, standard at main@f63ca72e116d), and against the standard’s own record of what it has adopted (29 written proposals, 176 computed rules). Sample estate — demo data, no sign-up.

Create a free account to go further

You can browse without one. To request a quote, save a firm or choose one, you need an account. It is free to start, and there is no card.

Start free Sign in